The Sun newspaper has reported that American pop-stress, Britney Spears, 27, is getting married for the third time. ‘If the twinkling ring on her wedding finger is to be believed, Britney Spears is getting hitched for the third time,’ reported The Sun.
Rumours have been flying around that Spears is about to walk down the aisle again with manager and boyfriend Jason Trawick, 37. Mother, Lynne Spears told The Sun: “He is the kind of man you would dream of your daughter marrying. The kids love him, and he’s stable.”
Online gossip mag, Gossipcop.com checked the latest rumour with an inside source who stated a wedding is definitely “not on the horizon” anytime soon. The feisty pop star is known for wearing several diamond rings (none of which turned out to be an engagement ring) and for playing the media.
Spears was first married to childhood friend Jason Allen Alexander in January 2004 for 55 hours in Las Vegas.
Marriage famously annulled
The marriage was famously annulled with the statement Spears “lacked understanding of her actions to the extent that she was incapable of agreeing to marriage because before entering into the marriage; the Plaintiff and Defendant did not know each others’ likes and dislikes, each others’ desires to have or not have children, and each other’s desires as to State of residency”.
The international teen pop icon then became engaged to Kevin Federline in July 2004, three months after they met and married him in September 2004 in a non-denominational ceremony in California. They have two sons: Sean Preston and Jayden James. Spears filed for divorce in November 2006.
Yes Britney Spears. Many rational people have become a big fan and can not get too much data or articles about her career. With recent hair trimming, hot videos, wedding breakdowns or just another pop single there is a lot happening around her. Pity about the kids involvement but I imagine the cash will assist them. The media age is her opportunity for money but will it be her downfall with too much coverage and pressure. In fact I guess that this posting and my few lines are the identical exposure I talked about.